For Minecraft 1.17 and newer, head to the new website

Feature: #0658 - Organising!

StephanoTheSheep
Type: Member
Joined: 07/17/2014
Tracker ID:#0658
Type:Feature
Created:
Message:
People have suggested naming crafting CPUs to help with logistics and I think this is a great idea. I do not think it should stop there however. OCD makes me want to make everything clear, organised and easy to access! I would absolutely love it if you could name interfaces, for example, macerator, or fluid transposer, depending on what machine/molecular assembler you have it attached to, and then when using the M.E. Interface Terminal it would have the name of the interface as the header for each chunk, and then the slots for patterns underneath. This would make life extremely easy. Also, naming M.E. Storage Cells and maybe having an M.E. Cell Monitor would be great, if you had a partitioned drive for ores, you could make it, easily find it in the cell monitor, remotely take the drive out, sort viewed items by cell (i know view cells exist and they are awesome, but i feel this would add more functionality) and this would make the partitioning of storage cells extremely useful. Thank you for taking these suggestions on board, please feel free to write any comments or questions below and thank you so much Algorithm for your amazing mod! Sincerely, An avid Applied Energistics player!
Comment
AlgorithmX2
Type: Admin
Joined: 12/31/2012
Posted:
Comment:
You can already name the CPUs that's in already, also you can name interfaces too, that's in as well ( they also when unnamed use the names of the attached machines ).
Comment
StephanoTheSheep
Type: Member
Joined: 07/17/2014
Posted:
Comment:
When interfaces are named do they show up under their name in sections in the interface terminal? Also would naming storage cells be possible too, as this would really be cool and would work if you had a view by different cell on the me monitor
Comment
AlgorithmX2
Type: Admin
Joined: 12/31/2012
Posted:
Comment:
Yes they do show up under their own name. The cell monitor would require new drive or something, and honestly I don't think it has the same need. The interface makes sense cause it already has both the cores needed to do this, drives however have no cores at all. I don't think viewing by cell or having a cell monitor will work out as well as the Terminal Interface, the diffrent types of drives, and such just don't support that type of thing as well as the interfaces do.
Comment
StephanoTheSheep
Type: Member
Joined: 07/17/2014
Posted:
Comment:
Ok thanks for taking on board my suggestion though!
Comment
thatsIch
Type: Moderator
Joined: 02/05/2013
Posted:
Comment:
Closing, cause bacon
Back to List